Thursday, November 28, 2024

Tulsi Gabbard - a good choice for Director of National Intelligence? My take

Tulsi Gabbard - a good choice for Director of National Intelligence

by Donald H. Marks, physician-scientist  and third generation veteran.


Tulsi Gabbard, a former U.S. Congresswoman and presidential candidate, has occasionally been criticized by certain commentators and partisan analysts who have questioned her positions on foreign policy and her past interactions with controversial figures or governments. Most recently, she has been nominated as Director of National Intelligence by incoming President Trump.  Labeling her a "security risk," by some, however, is IMO seems to be more unnecessary partisan hyperbole. The term security risk is vague and depends on the specific context and evidence presented. This appears to me both inappropriate and wrong. 



Criticisms and Concerns


1. Foreign Policy Views: Gabbard has been outspoken against U.S. military interventions, which some critics interpreted as being sympathetic to adversarial nations like Russia or Syria. Her meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2017, for example, drew significant criticism from those who view Assad as a war criminal. Perhaps this was a similar crowd to those who labeled former Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger as a war criminal.  See my notes on that issue in the references below.

 Gabbard has taking great pains on a number of occasions to explain the rationale behind this meeting and her explanations seem reasonable to me. Similar for Kissinger.


2. Russian Propagandist

Allegations: During the 2020 Democratic primary, Hillary Clinton implied (without naming her directly) that Gabbard was a potential "favorite" of Russian propaganda efforts. Gabbard strongly denied these accusations, calling them baseless, and I, too, view Clinton's allegations as no more than political smears in the context of a contentious election that Clinton lost.


3. Support from Fringe Groups: 

Gabbard has garnered support from some non-mainstream and far-right groups, which has raised questions about her appeal to these factions. However, she has not explicitly aligned herself with such ideologies, and unsolicited support definitely does not equate to endorsement by her.


4. Defensive Against Criticism: Some interpret her vigorous responses to criticism as overly confrontational, fueling perceptions of controversy. To me. it's really just the same criticism that could be made against Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren and many others..


Counterarguments


1. Patriotism and Service: Gabbard is a U.S. military veteran who served in the Army National Guard, including deployments to Iraq. Her supporters argue that her service demonstrates her commitment to the country, and I, as a 3rd generation veteran, see no reason to disagree.


2. Non-Interventionism: 

Many view her foreign policy positions as principled rather than risky, advocating for diplomacy over war. She definitely is not a neocon. I am always reminded of the admonition by President Eisenhower to beware of the military industrial complex, and to resist the desire to intervene in other countries business


3. Lack of Evidence: To date, there has been no concrete evidence linking Gabbard to any security threats or espionage activities.


4. Political Bias:

It would seem that many criticisms stem from political differences rather than genuine security concerns. Critics should carefully choose what hill they want to battle from.


Conclusions


As far as I am aware, there is no publicly available evidence suggesting Tulsi Gabbard is an actual "security risk" to the U.S. The debate over her stances seems to be more rooted in political and ideological disagreements rather than in substantive security concerns. 

Many view Gabbard’s foreign policy positions as principled rather than risky, advocating for diplomacy over war. In that sense alone, she is not a Neocon, which is a plus in my book.  See my notes on Neocons, Neolibs 


The label of "security risk" is vague and often subjective, and can reflect political strategies on both sides, rather than factual assessments, as it does in this case. I suspect that Gabbard will pass the FBI and other background checks, and that she will be a fine Director of National Intelligence and I wish her well.


References

Is criticism of Henry Kissinger (Super K) just another form of historical revisionism? DH Marks


Elitists, Neocons, Globalists. Oh my!   What are they, who are they, and why should I care? DH Marks


Tulsi Gabbard’s Nomination Is a National-Security Risk. Opinion by Tom Nichol. The Atlantic 2024


Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Thoughts on responsibilities of young American citizens - my reflections on remarks made by the great JFK at Amherst College in 1963

Thoughts on responsibilities of young American citizens. My reflections on remarks made by JFK at Amherst College in 1963.



by Donald H. Marks, physician and scientist



Let me put on my non-medical hat and speak as a casual student of history and the Arts, as I discuss remarks made by President JFK in 1963 at Amherst College upon receiving an honorary degree. Yes I was alive that long ago, as I was born when I was very young. I am a great admirer of JFK who, along with FDR, are my two favorite presidents. I have long thought about those words from the past, and over several years I have worked to put pen to paper, as people used to say.  A man from a wealthy powerful family, a man of means, a politician with good intentions, someone with a global vision, a man connected to the famous, the wealthy, the powerful, the educated, the connected, a man presented at birth with the opportunity to achieve greatness by his birth, a man who put his life on the line for the United States in combat, truly a man for all seasons. To this day, I remember his greatness, the day he died, and I still grieve his loss, especially in the context of current aggressive, highly partisan, take-no-prisoners political life.

In his speech at Amherst, President Kennedy explained the responsibilities and the importance of public service for all citizens, and especially  educated citizens. Addressing the class at Amherst, JFK described his view of the role of an artist in society, noting his personal friend Robert Frost’s contributions to American arts, culture, and ideology. “When power leads men towards arrogance, poetry reminds him of his limitations. When power narrows the areas of man’s concern, poetry reminds him of the richness and diversity of existence. When power corrupts, poetry cleanses."


Robert Frost and other artists, Kennedy said, make a vital contribution “not to our size but to our spirit, not to our political beliefs but to our insight, not to our self-esteem, but to our self-comprehension.”


Those memorable words, as well as Kennedy’s call that day for Amherst students to consider how they might serve their country, inspired students at Amherst, and throughout the USA. Five percent of the Amherst senior class of 1964 joined the Peace Corps, the overseas service organization Kennedy had initiated in 1961.


The gridlock and dysfunctional partisanship in Washington, D.C. today poorly compares to the optimism and progressive spirit that seemed to animate the years of the Kennedy administration, at least insofar as I remember it.

 

The friendship between Kennedy and the poet Robert Frost, dating back to when Kennedy first ran for president, turned cold in the early fall of 1962 after Frost returned from a visit to the Soviet Union and a lengthy talk about cultural exchange with then-Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev.


Frost had a cold and a bad case of jet lag when he returned to the U.S.. Many of us have been there. He gave what appeared to have been a somewhat confused interview, during which he related that Premier Khrushchev had claimed to him that the U.S. “was too liberal to fight.” Frost’s remarks angered Kennedy, causing him to cut off contact with Frost.  Only a month later, the Cuban Missile Crisis developed, with a potential nuclear war. How many of us have similarly cut off a relationship due to a hasty remark, an inopportune comment, thoughts taken out of context or misunderstood, religious or political disagreements? Breaks in friendship can mend, but the pain swirls like a memory underneath, waiting for a fitful rebirth and revenge.


Yet, Kennedy buried the hatchet when he came to Amherst, praising Frost’s poetry and his contribution to the American spirit. Frost was an artist who, Kennedy said, “saw poetry as the means of saving power from itself."


The president also told Amherst students that, given the benefits they enjoyed in attending an elite private college in a country that had great disparities in wealth, he hoped they would put their education toward some kind of public service. And back then, many did. Not at all like today.


I hope that my comments won't just be viewed as a snapshot of the past, but as how those issues and ideals that Kennedy spoke about during his visit to Amherst can apply to our lives today … across the political spectrum. The responsibilities of the wealthy, the educated, the fortunate, the artists, the creative entrepreneur, and those lucky enough to live in Western society and in America in particular are a treasure.


References

JFK speech at Amherst College https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/historic-speeches/remarks-at-amherst-college-on-the-arts

You're probably misreading Robert Frost's most famous poem, "The Road Not Taken." https://lithub.com/youre-probably-misreading-robert-frosts-most-famous-poem/





Additional writings of Donald H. Marks, physician-scientist can be found on this blog site

Sensay.AI replica of Donald Harvey Marks

My Blog List